Head-to-Head Comparison

Bolt.newvsSourcegraph Cody

Compare Bolt.new with Sourcegraph Cody to determine which tool better fits your AI development workflow.

Bolt.new

Collaborative PlatformBeginner

Browser-based collaborative AI coding environment with token-centric pricing and multiplayer features

Learning Time
1-2 hours to proficiency
Popularity
69%

Top Advantages:

Browser-based real-time collaboration
Token-based cost control
Multiplayer AI-assisted development

Sourcegraph Cody

Enterprise AssistantIntermediate

Context-aware AI coding assistant with enterprise-grade LLM flexibility and code graph integration

Learning Time
2-4 weeks to proficiency
Popularity
72%

Top Advantages:

Multiple LLM support (GPT-4, Claude, Gemini)
Bring-Your-Own-LLM flexibility
Enterprise codegraph integration

Head-to-Head Comparison

CriteriaBoltWinnerCody
Popularity69%72%
Learning Curve1-2 hours to proficiency2-4 weeks to proficiency
Pricing$20-$200/month based on token usageSimilar$9/month Pro, $59/user/month Enterprise
CategoryCollaborative PlatformDifferentEnterprise Assistant

When to Choose Which Tool

Choose Bolt When:

  • You need collaborative platform capabilities
  • Your team prefers beginner complexity tools
  • Budget allows for: $20-$200/month based on token usage

Choose Cody When:

  • You need enterprise assistant capabilities
  • Your team prefers intermediate complexity tools
  • Budget allows for: $9/month Pro, $59/user/month Enterprise

Bottom Line

Cody has higher industry adoption (72% vs 69%), but Bolt might be better for specific collaborative platform needs.

Compare both tools hands-on in our vibe coding retreats

Master Both Bolt & Cody

Experience both Bolt and Cody in our vibe coding retreats. Make an informed decision with hands-on comparison.

v0
UI Generation
Cursor
AI IDE
n8n
Workflow Automation
Claude Code
CLI Assistant
Prompt Engineering
Foundation Skill
Get Updates

Retreat dates, tool updates, and AI development tips