Head-to-Head Comparison
Continue.devvsOpenAI Codex
Compare Continue.dev with OpenAI Codex to determine which tool better fits your AI development workflow.
Continue.dev
Open Source Assistant • Intermediate
Open-source AI coding assistant with custom model integration and modular plugin architecture
Learning Time
2-3 weeks to proficiency
Popularity
76%
Top Advantages:
26K+ GitHub stars community
Custom AI model integration
Open-source with enterprise options
OpenAI Codex
Code Generation Model • Intermediate
Foundation model powering GitHub Copilot with natural language to code translation and CLI tools
Learning Time
2-20 hours depending on usage
Popularity
96%
Top Advantages:
Powers GitHub Copilot ecosystem
Massive context handling capabilities
Multi-threaded task processing
Head-to-Head Comparison
| Criteria | Continue | Winner | Codex |
|---|---|---|---|
| Popularity | 76% | 96% | |
| Learning Curve | 2-3 weeks to proficiency | 2-20 hours depending on usage | |
| Pricing | Free Solo, $10/dev/month Teams | $1.50/1M input tokens, $6/1M output tokens | |
| Category | Open Source Assistant | Different | Code Generation Model |
When to Choose Which Tool
Choose Continue When:
- You need open source assistant capabilities
- Your team prefers intermediate complexity tools
- Budget allows for: Free Solo, $10/dev/month Teams
Choose Codex When:
- You need code generation model capabilities
- Your team prefers intermediate complexity tools
- Budget allows for: $1.50/1M input tokens, $6/1M output tokens
Bottom Line
Codex has higher industry adoption (96% vs 76%), but Continue might be better for specific open source assistant needs.
Compare both tools hands-on in our vibe coding retreats
Master Both Continue & Codex
Experience both Continue and Codex in our vibe coding retreats. Make an informed decision with hands-on comparison.
v0
UI Generation
Cursor
AI IDE
n8n
Workflow Automation
Claude Code
CLI Assistant
Prompt Engineering
Foundation Skill
Available Cities
Get Updates
Retreat dates, tool updates, and AI development tips