Head-to-Head Comparison
Sourcegraph CodyvsContinue.dev
Compare Sourcegraph Cody with Continue.dev to determine which tool better fits your AI development workflow.
Sourcegraph Cody
Enterprise Assistant • Intermediate
Context-aware AI coding assistant with enterprise-grade LLM flexibility and code graph integration
Learning Time
2-4 weeks to proficiency
Popularity
72%
Top Advantages:
Multiple LLM support (GPT-4, Claude, Gemini)
Bring-Your-Own-LLM flexibility
Enterprise codegraph integration
Continue.dev
Open Source Assistant • Intermediate
Open-source AI coding assistant with custom model integration and modular plugin architecture
Learning Time
2-3 weeks to proficiency
Popularity
76%
Top Advantages:
26K+ GitHub stars community
Custom AI model integration
Open-source with enterprise options
Head-to-Head Comparison
| Criteria | Cody | Winner | Continue |
|---|---|---|---|
| Popularity | 72% | 76% | |
| Learning Curve | 2-4 weeks to proficiency | 2-3 weeks to proficiency | |
| Pricing | $9/month Pro, $59/user/month Enterprise | Free Solo, $10/dev/month Teams | |
| Category | Enterprise Assistant | Different | Open Source Assistant |
When to Choose Which Tool
Choose Cody When:
- You need enterprise assistant capabilities
- Your team prefers intermediate complexity tools
- Budget allows for: $9/month Pro, $59/user/month Enterprise
Choose Continue When:
- You need open source assistant capabilities
- Your team prefers intermediate complexity tools
- Budget allows for: Free Solo, $10/dev/month Teams
Bottom Line
Continue has higher industry adoption (76% vs 72%), but Cody might be better for specific enterprise assistant needs.
Compare both tools hands-on in our vibe coding retreats
Master Both Cody & Continue
Experience both Cody and Continue in our vibe coding retreats. Make an informed decision with hands-on comparison.
v0
UI Generation
Cursor
AI IDE
n8n
Workflow Automation
Claude Code
CLI Assistant
Prompt Engineering
Foundation Skill
Available Cities
Get Updates
Retreat dates, tool updates, and AI development tips